logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2019.03.13 2018고정38
문화재보호법위반등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A limited liability company B is an agricultural company located in C in the following cities, and the defendant A is the representative of the above corporation.

1. A person who intends to convert a mountainous district by a defendant shall obtain permission from the Administrator of the Korea Forest Service, etc. according to the classification of the kind, area, etc. of the mountainous district specified by

Nevertheless, Defendant A, without obtaining permission from the competent authority on June 2017, intended to resume the access roads connected to the above forest in the area of the D Forest in Yasan-si (around 800 square meters) around the end of June, 201, Defendant A removed trees and converted the use of the cryp to the mountainous district by changing the form and quality of the land.

2. Defendant B limited liability company, Defendant B limited liability company, and Defendant A, the representative of the corporation, committed the act of violation with respect to the business of the corporation, such as the preceding paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of E and F;

1. Report on the results of an on-site investigation in accordance with the report on illegal acts (illegal forest damage) (the length was used as the previous access road to the land indicated on the facts constituting the crime, but the above trees were used for collective growth of standing timber, and considering the actual status of the land, it constitutes a mountainous district. In light of the actual status of the land, it is recognized that the Defendant removed trees from the above land to resume the access road and used it as a passage of dump truck after re-dump truck in order to remove trees from the above land to lower the soil cultivated by the Defendant using a dump truck, and re-enter the access road to lower the land. According to such recognized facts, the Defendant used the above land, which is a mountainous district, for any purpose other than that provided for in the items of subparagraph 2 of Article 2 of the Management of Mountainous Districts Act and converted mountainous district without obtaining permission from the competent authority

1. Article 53 of the Management of Mountainous Districts Act and Article 14 (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Mountainous Districts and Article 53 of the Act on the Punishment of Mountainous Districts A: Selection of fines;

arrow