The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

Since 2009, the defendant has been engaged in the management and operation of the subsidy granted from the Namyang-si as the person who was in charge of the affairs of the D organization in South-si, Namyang-si.

On March 19, 2010, the Defendant issued a card settlement to the Namyang-si Sports Association, and received a subsidy for the training expenses of the 56th Gyeonggi-do Sports Association granted again to the Namyang-si Sports Association, and used it for the training expenses of the land players. However, on April 12, 2010, the Defendant settled the card settlement of KRW 670,00 as if the land players engaged in training at the F cafeteria located in Nam-si, Namyang-si, Namyang-si, and then falsely adjusted the card settlement after immediately cancelling the card settlement and using the card settlement as training expenses.

From April 12, 2010 to April 30, 2010, the Defendant arbitrarily consumed KRW 10,029,000, which was falsely settled as follows, as follows, and thereby inflicted property damage equivalent to the same amount on the South-North Korean Sports Association.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Application of statutes to the 56th Gyeonggi-do copies of the settlement documents of sports games, copies of receipt files, and copies of the statement of ordinary deposits transactions;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 356 and 355 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence 59(1) of the Pronouncement of the Pronouncement of the Suspension of Sentence 700,00 won (where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 10,000 won shall be confined in the workhouses (Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Code) and defense counsel for the defendant and his defense counsel, taking into account the fact that the defendant used the above money under the pretext of encouragement for participating players and did not gain personal profits, and that the defendant has been paid cash in the above manner since he was in charge of managing a managing director, but there was a practice that the defendant paid cash in the above manner. However, the defendant after the instant case, in the form of a direct transfer by account transfer).