logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.12.22 2014고정2385
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged and C, C, and D are E middle School Dongs, and F (26) and victim G (28) are friendship relationships.

Around 01:00 on December 29, 2013, the Defendant and C, and C, and D were in front of the “I” restaurant located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, and C took a bath mutually with F on the ground that F was c was frighted and frighted, and C took a bath to f on the ground that it was f was frightd and f was frightd, and C was fat once fated, and D was fatd by drinking, and the Defendant and C, and C were fatd by drinking, and the Defendant and C were fatd by drinking, followed by several times, and reported by F to the police, and when C and D’s face was fatd one time as drinking, respectively.

As a result, the defendant, C, and D jointly with those who are not aware of their names, put about about about 10-day care to F, such as the left-hand salt farm, etc., and the victim G about 21-day care for the 21-day care.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, the direct evidence corresponding to the facts charged in the instant case is only a witness J’s statement to the effect that “at the time of the Defendant’s assault was committed, it is not memory at the time, but a photograph was reported to the Guro Police Station after the instant assault, and the Defendant was designated as the perpetrator.” In light of the following circumstances, the above statement by the J’s court is difficult to believe it as it is, and the remaining evidence submitted by the Prosecutor is insufficient to acknowledge the facts charged in the instant case, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

At the time of 36 days after the date of the assault in this case, the witness J only 5-6 photographs presented by the police and identified a person who memorys as a perpetrator including the defendant at the time of reporting only 5-6 photographs presented by the police.

arrow