beta
Text
1. Upon a claim for change in exchange at the trial, the Plaintiff shall:
A. The Defendants listed in the separate sheet No. 1 are Daegu.
Reasons
1. Determination on this safety defense
A. The plaintiff's party ability 1) The defendant's defense 1) recognized his organization's nature in the lawsuit of this case as not a clan, and 278 square meters of the Daegu Dong-gu AO ditch (hereinafter "AO ditch").
A) As a measure to acquire the compensation for accommodation of a clan, it is merely a voluntary organization for the instant lawsuit in that a single meeting has not been open until that time, the judgment of a clan is not capable of being a party. 2) The judgment of a clan is a naturally created family organization formed by descendants of a common ancestor for the purpose of protecting the graves of a vessel and promoting friendship between their descendants, and is formed by the death of the ancestor and the descendants of the ancestor. If a clan has been engaged in continuous activities with an organization to the extent that it is represented by a representative elected in accordance with the rules or customs of a clan and is recognized as an organization as a non-corporate group (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 93Da2703, Sept. 30, 1994). The original clan does not constitute the original clan.
Even if a clan is similar to a clan, the establishment of a clan may be recognized. A non-corporate group similar to a clan does not necessarily establish an organization only after opening a general meeting and establishing a system for the cultivation of a clan, but rather, if a non-corporate group has formed a common property and continuously engaged in social activities centered on a person who takes the lead in the formation of a common property to achieve the common purpose, it shall be deemed that the non-corporate group has the substance as an organization from that time.
(See Supreme Court Decision 94Da56401 delivered on March 12, 1996, etc.). Considering the following circumstances that can be recognized by comprehensively taking into account the respective descriptions and arguments of the health team, Gap 3, 4, 15, and 19 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) under the above legal principles, the plaintiff is a party residing in ADri in Gyeongsan City among Gap descendants, or in ADri.