logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.04.09 2014고단7263
경매방해
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, for six months, for six months, and for six months, for six months, for each of the defendants C.

However, the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who was the representative director of the Dispute Settlement Council, who is the owner of the I Building No. 101, BB, Dong No. 101, Dong B, Dong No. 201 (hereinafter referred to as the "this building"). Defendant B is a construction business operator, Defendant A’s punishment, Defendant C is a representative director of K, Inc., Ltd., the Integrative Construction Business Co., Ltd., and Defendant C is a middle school colon of Defendant A.

On June 30, 2009, L, a creditor of the Dispute Settlement Council, applied for a compulsory auction to the Incheon District Court M, on July 15, 2009, applied for a voluntary auction to the Incheon District Court N on July 15, 2009, and on July 20, 201, the creditor Incheon Fisheries Cooperatives applied for a voluntary auction to the Incheon District CourtO on July 20, 201.

1. Defendant A and Defendant B entered into a contract for the interior works of Defendant A and the main building, and the construction cost of KRW 100,000,000 into the interior works of the building.

The Defendants prepared a false contract (the construction cost of KRW 340,140,000) as if Defendant B performed the interior and facility construction of the entire building, and offered to the above auction court for the payment of the amount equivalent to the claim amount of the false construction cost by submitting the lien report to the above auction court.

On August 1, 2011, the Defendants reported the lien of KRW 335,100,000 of the secured debt to the Incheon District Court, and submitted a false contract for construction to the effect that the J and Defendant B entered into a contract equivalent to the amount of the secured debt.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to report false lien and thereby, thereby doing so in a fraudulent way, thereby doing so.

2. Defendant A and Defendant C’s bid obstruction enter into a contract with Defendant A for construction, such as removal of ice from the main building, and the construction cost into approximately KRW 256,816,00.

arrow