A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 21, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court, and on May 8, 2015, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 4 million for the same crime, etc. at the same court.

On August 16, 2017, at around 22:05, the Defendant driven B-ho car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.084% from the 700-meter section of blood alcohol content to the front road of the G-ri-dong Hospital located in the G-ri-dong, Gwangju at the night room, G-gu, Gwangju, 127.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, report on investigation (referring to the same previous convictions);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection and Order to provide community service, order to attend lectures, and order to attend lectures;

A. Unfavorable conditions: The defendant recommits the crime of this case even though he was punished twice due to drinking, driving, etc.

(b) favorable conditions: The defendant's acknowledgement of the crime of this case and reflects his mistake, and there is no record of punishment of suspended execution or more;

C. The Defendant’s punishment was determined in consideration of the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, and other various sentencing conditions specified in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which were revealed in the records of the instant case.