logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.11.08 2015가단29951
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 16, 2015, between Nonparty E and the Defendant, the mother of the Plaintiffs, written a written contract to purchase KRW 955,000,000 (the contract amount of KRW 125,000,000,000, which was paid at the time of the contract, and the balance of KRW 830,000,000, which was paid at the time of the contract) with Nonparty E and the Defendant, KRW 1,400,000,000, the same day was added to a separate contract with KRW 1,40,000.

B. On April 20, 2015, the Plaintiffs concluded a contract with the Defendant to purchase the instant real estate in total amount of KRW 955,000,000 (the amount of KRW 125,000,000,000,000, which was paid at the time of the contract, and the intermediate payment of KRW 15,000,000, which was paid at the time of May 12, 2015, and the amount of KRW 815,00,000,000, which was paid on May 28, 2015), and the terms and conditions of the contract are as follows.

Matters of special agreement

1. The contract after the buyer's direct verification is made; 2. The amount of KRW 720,00,000,000,000 for the creation of collateral collateral collateral on the register of the register (the branch of the collateral mortgagee in Korea);

3. The creation of a collateral security shall be cancelled by the date of the balance prior to the transfer of registration.

4. The down payment and remainder shall be transferred to the seller’s account.

(GD) Daegu Bank GD

5. The management of superficies shall be made until the balance date so that there is no problem in the transfer of registration thereof;

6. The seller shall actively cooperate to ensure that there is no problem in permission and succession before the balance date.

7. Goods inside buildings, the location of which is located, equipment and materials, and facilities shall be preserved in a current state;

C. On May 28, 2015, each registration of ownership transfer was made in the name of the Plaintiffs regarding the instant real estate.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1-2, 3, Eul evidence 2-1 to 9, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion is that the defendant should compensate for the cost of repairing defects since he concealed and sold soup pipe pipe water among the real estate in this case. If the defendant sells pipe pipe water.

arrow