logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2015.06.25 2014가합106262
물품대금
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) KRW 19,908,056 and KRW 9,647,106 among them, Defendant (Counterclaim Defendant) shall have the effect on October 11, 2013.

Reasons

(2) The Plaintiff and the Defendant supplied the Defendant with GT-1950 SPK Green Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant product”) equivalent to the raw materials of GT-19500 SPK GT 19500 GT-19500 GT-1950, which is a part of the mobile phone spackers manufactured by the Defendant, and issued a tax invoice monthly settlement, and the Defendant agreed to pay the price to the Plaintiff by 10th of the month that becomes three months after the date of issuance of the tax invoice (hereinafter “instant contract”). Accordingly, the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with the product of this case from May 2013 to December 2013, 2013, and the Plaintiff did not have any obligation to pay KRW 160 to the Plaintiff the total amount of KRW 160 to KRW 160,00,000, KRW 16310,016, and KRW 1665,010.

The defendant's assertion as to the defendant's defense was deceiving that the plaintiff would directly produce and supply the product of this case at his own factory located in Ansan, and the defendant believed this, and concluded the contract of this case with the plaintiff, and if the plaintiff knew that the plaintiff did not manufacture the product of this case itself, the contract of this case was not concluded. The plaintiff was merely a distributor who did not have production facilities and purchased it from a third party and supplied it to the defendant.

arrow