logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.24 2015고합470
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

1. Defendant A’s imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months, Defendant B’s imprisonment for eight months, and Defendant C for three years and six months, respectively.

Reasons

Facts of crime

1. Defendants A, who committed the joint crime of the Defendants, advertised sexual traffic establishments to the Internet site “J”, etc., and operated sexual traffic establishments with the trade name “L” at Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government K, while communicating with female employees, telephone consultation, and reservation. Defendants B and C decided to take charge of customer guidance, etc. at each night and week.

From October 2014 to May 21, 2015, the Defendants conspired with each other (the Defendant B, from January 2015, to January 20, 2015), up to 70 square meters, two waiting rooms, two control expenses CCTV, etc. were installed in the above place, and received telephone reservations from female employees M, N,O, etc., and received 75,000 won in cash from male customers who found the above place of business, and had female employees receive 75,000 won in cash, and had them do the act of similarity by allowing them to take the attitude they wanted, and to neglect their sexual intercourse by allowing them to do so by hand.

2. From May 2015 to May 20, 2015, Defendant C expressed a job offer advertisement via the “P” hosting site at the above location, and interview on N (the age of 18) which is a juvenile who reported and contacted the advertisement, Defendant C as a female employee of the said establishment, and had N as a juvenile, from May 20, 2015 to May 21:20, 2015, she used the said place to have N as a female employee of the said establishment, carried out a similar act by having the male customer wear the clothes selected by him/her, and let the customer take the attitude desired by him/her and her hoscate his/her sexual organ by allowing him/her to do the act of arranging the act of purchasing the sex of juveniles.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement of N or M;

1. Statement of seizure of each police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to three copies of business accounting books (No. 24 of the evidence list), and copies of business accounting books (No. 50 of the evidence list);

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

A. Defendant A and B: each of them.

arrow