logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.12.12 2018나310567
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the dismissal or addition as set forth in paragraph (2) below, and thus, it is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Article 10 and 11 of the High Court Decision No. 3rd 10 and 11 of the High Court Decision "the plaintiff has maintained the service supply contract with the defendant until August 31, 2017, which is the contract term." The contract of this case was maintained until August 31, 2017, which is the initial contract term." The fourth 5 and 6th 5th 6th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th.).

On the other hand, Article 10 (4) and (1) of the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act shall be applied.

arrow