The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the fact-finding) was that the Defendant did not insult the victim police officers at the time.

2. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, G, a police officer, who was dispatched to the site by a report of H, the principal restaurant at the time, was consistently stated from the investigative agency to the court below, that at the time of the court below, the Defendant had expressed an insulting speech, such as the statement of the facts constituting a crime in the judgment below, F, a police officer who was dispatched to the site along with G, also stated in the court below that at the time of the court below, the Defendant had expressed an insulting speech to himself and F, such as the statement of the facts constituting a crime in the judgment of the court below, and H, a restaurant principal who reported the Defendant to the police at the time of the court below since the investigative agency, and from the court below to the court below, he consistently stated that it was consistent with the statement of the above police officer, and that at the time, the victims, the police officer at the time, treated the Defendant as a person with no knowledge or a person without permission, and treat him as a person with no knowledge of the crime in the judgment below.

In light of the fact that no evidence was submitted to deem that the defendant was in an excessive exercise of public authority, such as confinement of the defendant for a long time and taking clothes, even though the fact of suspicion is minor, etc., the defendant at the time may sufficiently recognize the fact of insult of the victims by speaking to the victim F and G, a police officer, as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment below, at a restaurant and global belt.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.