logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.14 2014가합9934
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant G: (a) on the Plaintiff’s KRW 1,50,000 for each of the said KRW 261,057,168, Plaintiff B, C, D, and E; and (b) on each of the said KRW 1,50,000 for each of the said money.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant F is the owner of the Gangnam-gu Seoul H fifth floor building (hereinafter “instant building”), and Defendant G is a person who engages in the glass construction business with the trade name “I”.

B. The head of Gangnam-gu issued a corrective order on September 3, 2013 to Defendant F on the ground that the glass structure installed on the rooftop among the instant building constitutes an illegal building, and on November 12, 2013, notified Defendant F of the fact that the said corrective order was not implemented.

C. The instant building was managed by the J, which is the fraud of Defendant F, but around November 2013, J requested Defendant G to remove the glass of the rooftop as pointed out in the instant corrective order from the instant building and affix a photograph and affix it again (hereinafter “instant construction”).

Defendant G refused to refuse the construction of a mother and child body, and directly visited the site and confirmed the site, and demanded the J to pay KRW 5 million for the construction cost. Defendant G accepted this and thereby Defendant G entrusted the instant construction.

E. Defendant G introduced eight parts, including the network K (hereinafter “the network”), through the spons, and organized the team, and started work of free removal on the rooftop of the instant building from the Astring of December 12, 2013. The deceased, if the other spons of glass, was removed, was in charge of cleaning the spons of glass while supporting the body of the spons beam located below the glass.

F. At around 10:50 on the same day, the parts of the Defendant G and the deceased, etc., were facing coffee and have rest time again, and the deceased moved to work location. The deceased did not see the safety and height of the safety belt worn up on the body at the above work site, and died due to brain injury on credit by falling down at the entrance of the underground parking lot of the instant building, which was installed at the above work site.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). G.

arrow