The defendant is not guilty. The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the above judgment shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is as follows: (a) even though the Defendant did not think of marriage to the victim C (or 24 years of age) at the time in Ulsan City B on February 11, 1981 at the time of Ulsan City B on February 22:0, 1981, the Defendant believed the victim C (or 24 years of age) to believe the Defendant’s false words, such as “I would not have any desire to marry but I would not have any choice but I would not have any choice but any choice of marriage; and (b) 3 times or 3 times or more of

3.1. Women and girls and four times in such a manner as above at the Indones located in Busan D, and the same year.

4. On December 12, 07:30, the victim had sexual intercourse with the victim by precluding a total of eight times of marriage, such as sexual intercourses, from the female E in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, one time through the above methods.

2. The prosecutor charged a public prosecution against the above charged facts by applying Article 304 of the Criminal Act. However, the part of "a person who induces a female who does not habitually engage in sexual intercourse by deceiving such female under the circumstance of marriage" in Article 304 of the same Act was ruled unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court Decision 2008Hun-Ba58, 2009Hun-Ba191, Nov. 26, 2009. Accordingly, pursuant to the proviso of Article 47 (2) of the Constitutional Court Act, the above provision of the same Act retroactively lost its effect.

Thus, since the facts charged in this case are not a crime, it shall be pronounced not guilty pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it shall be decided as per Disposition by publicly announcing the summary of the judgment against the defendant pursuant to Article 58 (2) of the Criminal Act.