The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (ten months of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The lower court sentenced the Defendant to ten months of imprisonment, taking into account the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant and favorable to the Defendant.

The judgment of the court below exceeded the reasonable limit of discretion in full view of the following factors: (a) most of the crimes of this case were stolen by the victims’ injury to the victims’ or their structures; and (b) the fact that the sentencing of the court below exceeded the reasonable limit of discretion in full view of the following factors: (c) the sentencing of the court below exceeded the scope of discretion

There is no circumstance that it is deemed unfair to maintain the judgment of the court below as it is or that the judgment of the court below is unfair.

In addition, even if the circumstances and results of the instant crime were to be considered, the sentence of the lower court is appropriate, and it is not deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable, considering the following factors: the Defendant’s age, sex, family relationship, etc. after the instant crime.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.