logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.05.25 2017고정270
횡령
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2014. 2. 19. 부산 해운대구 B, 2102호 피고인의 집에서 피해자 ' 에이 제이 네트웍 스( 주) ‘에 전화를 걸어 약 691,200원 상당의 엘지 TV 1대를 36개월 동안 월 렌 탈료 24,200원을 상환하고 반환하는 조건으로 렌 탈 계약을 체결하였다.

On September 14, 2015, the Defendant embezzled the victim’s property by refusing to return, even though the Defendant received a demand from the injured party for return of the sirens due to the termination of the siren contract due to the unpaid payment of the sirens.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a petition, a summary of contract, a sirens request, and a written statement;

1. Article 355 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 355 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant’s failure to return the sirens away goods is paid for the return of the sirens, and that the return of the sirens only without paying the penalty is somewhat affected. However, the amount of the fine imposed in the summary order is deemed to have already been determined in consideration of such circumstances. Thus, additional mitigation should not be made, given that the amount of the fine imposed in the summary order is considered to have been determined.

arrow