1. All appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows 2. In addition, the part of the 6th to 7th of the judgment of the court of first instance, and the part of the 8th of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the 8th of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the 5th of the 1st of the 1st of the 1st of the 1st of the

2. In a case where a real estate transaction party delegates a brokerage of real estate transactions to a practicing licensed real estate agent, a practicing licensed real estate agent has a duty to investigate and confirm the relationship of rights of the object of brokerage in accordance with the purport of delegation and is liable to compensate for any damage incurred therefrom if he/she violates his/her duty of care. However, the obligation to investigate and confirm the transaction relation which the transaction party itself owes to the practicing licensed real estate agent who has entrusted the brokerage shall not be deemed to be beyond his/her responsibility. Thus, if a practicing licensed real estate agent fails to perform his/her duty of investigation and confirmation as to the transaction relation and determines the scope of compensation for the damage incurred to the brokerage client due to failure to perform his/her duty of investigation and confirmation as to the transaction relation in arranging real estate transactions, it shall be deemed that the brokerage client, who has been the victim, has been negligent, and it shall be deemed that the negligence may be offset in light of the basic principle of the

(See Supreme Court Decision 2012Da69654 Decided November 29, 2012, etc.)

3. The supplementary part is even after the termination of each contract of this case by the plaintiffs.