logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.02.02 2017구단7262
간병급여 부지급처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 5, 2001, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “cerebral cerebrovascularssis and the right-hand paralysis” due to occupational accidents. After closing the medical care on February 8, 2002, the Plaintiff was determined as class 2 subparag. 5 of the disability grade (a person whose disorder in the function or mental function of the neurosis remains from time to time) and received occasional nursing benefits accordingly.

B. The Plaintiff filed a claim for nursing benefits with the Defendant from July 1, 2016 to July 25, 2016. On July 20, 2016, the Defendant: (a) the Plaintiff’s main physician of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Hospital is able to provide minimum support after the performance; (b) the Plaintiff’s personal hygiene on the examination may be carried out at least; (c) both arms, breasts, and bridges may be taken out from bathing; (d) the Plaintiff shall be able to take part in bathing, and the treatment of urine is able to be carried out by himself from the table of meals on his own; and (e) the treatment of urine is necessary to supervise safety at the 20th century; and (e) the Defendant is able to be exempted from clothes on his own; and (e) the Plaintiff’s personal hygiene from 0.7 times to 7.7 meters of advisory opinions, etc. on the basis of “the need for 206th anniversary of walking nursing benefits”.

(hereinafter referred to as the above determination of site price for nursing benefits shall be the disposition of the instant case (hereinafter referred to as “instant determination”).

The Plaintiff, who is dissatisfied with the disposition of the instant case, filed a request for examination and a request for reexamination, but all dismissed.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 5, 6, 8, Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 3 are all the statements and arguments.

arrow