logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.12.04 2014고단1157
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of C MT moving vehicles.

On June 26, 2014, at around 08:20, the Defendant driven the above gas station, and changed the lane to one lane while driving approximately KRW 300 meters from the west, west, the west, the west, the west, the west, the west, the west, and the west, the west, the west, the west, and the west, the west.

Since this is a hond road on the right side, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to change the lanes in a safe way by properly examining the traffic situation of the front and rear left.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and led the victim D(33 years old) driving in the same direction due to the negligence of changing the lane into the left-hand one, and led the victim D(33 years old) driving car to avoid the collision with the oil vehicle of the Defendant, and got the central separation zone and to return it to the right-hand retaining wall on the road two times when the balance is lost.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim, such as a scambling, etc. in need of approximately eight weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, destroyed the scaming car of KRW 7,360,000 at the market price, and escaped without immediately stopping the vehicle and providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G in part;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. The actual condition survey report and evidence and photographs of the scene of a traffic accident;

1. A medical certificate (D);

1. According to the above evidence, in order to avoid the collision with the oil vehicles of the defendant who changed the lane, the victim was trying to avoid the collision by manipulating hand to the central separation zone in order to avoid the collision with the oil vehicles of the defendant who changed the lane. The accident of this case occurred, and the defendant was after the accident occurred.

arrow