Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who works as the publisher of the C newspaper in Gyeonggi-si, B, and the victim D is a person who works as a secretary in an organization of E Union.

In F around F, the Defendant refers to the victim on the ground that the victim drafted a flagist to the effect that the victim would be seen as the president of the IF association in the regional newspaper of H, and, as the title “J”, the victim “X-type dog is re-claimed.” The Defendant’s act of cutting off a dog to the inside and going through a journal,” “an act of satisfing a journal in the manner of an anti-satisfing,” “an act of gathering a satisfing a dog in the shape of an anti-satisfing,” “an act of gathering a satisf, in which the head of the mother media, is being loaded,” and “an act of gathering a satisfing in the shape of a satch,” the Defendant’s satisfing so as to increase the head of a satch.

The term “an act and behavior that are likely to become the object of society” was inserted in a letter of criticism that contains the expression “assumptive act and behavior.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Appellants, advisers for preparation of suspects;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court that the defendant did not constitute a crime because the victim was not specified in the Defendant’s written statement, the defendant did not specify the victim’s real name, in full view of the fact that the defendant prepared a written statement without specifying the victim’s real name, but referred the victim to “the Secretariat of the E organization” or indicating the title, etc. of advisory advisers, which the victim was committed.