1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 8,043,954 for each of the KRW 12,065,931 for Plaintiff A, Plaintiff B, and Plaintiff C and each of them on March 7, 2018.

1. Basic facts

A. At around 23:50 on November 5, 2016, the insured vehicle of the Plaintiff driven by the deceased E (hereinafter “the deceased”) at the intersection of the dry-distance in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, in violation of the signal at the first lane on the right-hand turn from among the three-lane roads on which the insured vehicle of the Plaintiff was driven by the network (hereinafter “the network”) and the left-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-hand on the straight-hand signal. On the other hand, the deceased’s H taxi of Nonparty G driving, an insured vehicle of the Defendant, who was at the speed of 112 km per hour depending on the first lane, caused the death of the deceased due to a multiple prolonged electric shock during treatment around August 12, 2017.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

Plaintiff

A’s wife, Plaintiff B, and C are children of the deceased, and their respective property successors. The share of inheritance is 3/7 of the deceased and 2/7 of the remaining plaintiffs, respectively.

The defendant is a mutual aid business operator who has entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid contract for the instant sea vehicles.

C. After the occurrence of the instant accident, the Defendant argued that there was no responsibility for the amount of damages of the Deceased. Accordingly, the Plaintiffs demanded damages on the ground of Nonparty G’s negligence, which is the driver of the instant sea vehicle, but the Defendant rejected the claim, and the Plaintiffs filed the instant lawsuit.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's 1, 6 evidence, Gap's 2-1, 2-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the facts above, the defendant is obligated to compensate for the damage suffered by the deceased due to the accident in the instant case as a mutual aid business operator of the damage vehicle in the instant case.

B. The instant accident is deemed to have been caused by the principal negligence of the Plaintiff’s insured vehicle, which made a left turn to the right-hand signal at night in contravention of the signal signal at the intersection where signal lights are installed.

However, the evidence No. 2-1, No. 2, and No. 6 are integrated into the whole purport of the pleadings.