Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

However, with respect to Defendant A, the above sentence shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On November 24, 2015, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with approximately 100 meters alcohol concentration of 0.118% from the 100-meter section from the “F” front of Pyeongtaek-si E to the “G main store” front of the “G main store” located in Pyeongtaek-si. Around 23:10 on November 24, 2015.

B. The Defendant also driven a car on behalf of the Defendant on the road in front of the “G main shop” above at the time indicated in the port No. 1-A. A. On the ground that the police officer who received a 112 report after the occurrence of a traffic accident would have been subject to heavy punishment due to his previous drinking, while driving a car on behalf of the Defendant on the road in front of the “G main shop” on the day indicated in the port No. 1-A.

By asking statements, B made a statement so that he can take the driver's happiness.

Accordingly, the above B driven the car to the police officer dispatched to the site.

A false statement was made, and at around 23:35 on the same day, drinking was measured by inserting the whole in a drinking measuring instrument on behalf of the defendant at the same place.

As a result, the defendant instigated the above B to escape a person who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

(c)

On November 24, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 23:35, 2015, the police officers called to the scene as stated in Section 1-B of the “G main station” in Article 1-2; (b) expressed that “The police officers, who were sent to the scene, expressed that “The fluore is fright before the death and death,” expressed that “the fluore fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor,

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the dispatch of 112 reported police officers and the investigation of traffic accidents.

2. Defendant B: (a) on November 24, 2015, at Pyeongtaek-si E around 23:10.