A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 4, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a C Last truck under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.179% from a section of approximately 1 kilometer to a road located in Cheongju-si, Seo-gu, Daejeon Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City), with a view to around 22:50 on October 4, 2017, under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.179%.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is a holder of Cunst Cargo Vehicles.

On October 4, 2017, the Defendant operated the foregoing vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance within a section of approximately one kilometer from the roads with the new carbon vibration in Daejeon Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon to the roads located in the Cheongju-si, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul, to the roads located in 434-12 in the Cheongju-ri-ri 434-12.

3. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Cunst cargo vehicles in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

On October 4, 2017, the Defendant driven the above cargo while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.179% in blood at the 434-12, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, in a state of under the influence of alcohol content of 0.179% in the blood, and proceeded along the two-lanes between the nife and the nife distance from the nifbal on the nital side.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to drive the motor vehicle safely by putting the right on the front side and accurately operating the steering and steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in driving a vehicle in the front direction of the victim D(41 ) who was standing in the signal atmosphere from the front direction of the horse to the signal atmosphere. E- E- E- E- E was the front part of the vehicle driving by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of medical treatment for about two weeks due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Notification 1. Report on the circumstances of the driver in charge of driving and the result of the crackdown on drinking; and