Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for a maximum term of one year and six months, and a short term of one year.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On November 3, 2015, Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two months for the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapon, etc.) in the Jeonju District Court’s Eup branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 11, 2015. On April 27, 2016, Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of eight months for imprisonment with prison labor for night building intrusion larceny, etc. at Eup branch of the Jeonju District Court’s Jeonju District Court’s Eup branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 5, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. On June 20, 2016, the Defendants were in front of a restaurant with the trade name of “F” operated by the victim E in Yansan-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on the part of Jun. 20, 2016. Defendant B, in front of the restaurant, was in front of the restaurant. Defendant B, in front of and in front of and in front of the entrance, the strengthened glass door, which was corrected at the above restaurant, had a net in the vicinity, and Defendant A entered the above restaurant and carried 30,000 won in cash, which is the victim’s possession, located within the depository of the calculating unit of the area.

As a result, the Defendants, together, stolen cash owned by the said victim, and from that time, the same year from that time.

7. By June 7, 200, a total amount of KRW 1,704,00 was stolen from the victims’ property owned by the victims, as shown in the list of crimes attached hereto, together on six occasions.

2. On June 20, 2016, the Defendants were in front of the mutual convenience point of “I” operated by the victim H in Y in Y in Yasan-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City on June 20, 2016, and the Defendants, together with the above convenience points, string the entrance door, which was corrected at the above convenience points, and then Defendant A was able to see the network in the surrounding areas, and Defendant B followed Defendant B’s proposal within the above convenience point.

As a result, the Defendants attempted to steal the above victim's property together, but did not receive cash in the safe.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each statement of J, K, L, M, N, E, andO;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. Each report on investigation;

1. A fingerprint appraisal statement;

1. Each photograph;

1. Judgment.