The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the person who is the owner of the restaurant called “D” operated by the victim C in Sincho-si B.

On September 11:40, 2019, the Defendant expressed a desire to “D” in front of the instant “D,” on the street, on the ground that the victim did not go to a place of business, on the ground that the term of the contract expires, and carried out a bath to the victim, and the victim took a bath to the victim, and the victim took an outside of the contract, and the victim took a bath to the victim, as seen earlier, at the time of the victim’s hearing, E, etc., for a two-year period.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

2. Determination

(a) An offense subject to prosecution upon complaint: Articles 311 and 312 (1) of the Criminal Act;

B. After the prosecution of this case, the victim submitted a written withdrawal of complaint on March 12, 2021

C. Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act)