logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.02.27 2014고정2017
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On October 28, 2014, at around 23:50, the Defendant driving a knife B Coon, which was a member C of Ansan-si, led to the left-hand turn to the left-hand turn from the ridge to the outflow of the mountainside.

Since there is a cross-section with a signal apparatus, there was a duty of care for those engaged in driving service to drive safely according to the signals.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of violating the signal and left-hand turn on the stop signal, the victim E-driving's front part of the Fbenz car, which was placed on the right side from the left-hand side of the stop signal, was placed adjacent to the left-hand side of the above passenger car operated by the defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by negligence on the part of the Defendant, around two weeks from the above occupational negligence, light pelto and peltoum saf, etc., from the victim G, light safinite saf, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment, and light safinite saf, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim H.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the same Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of a selective fine for punishment (the choice of a fine for negligence shall be taken into account, such as the fact that the defendant confessions and reflects the fact that the defendant, two of the three human victims have agreed with the victim, the fact that the defendant's vehicle has subscribed to liability insurance and it appears that the recovery of damage to the other victim has not been agreed, and that the defendant has no specific penalty power, except once a fine, etc

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the dismissal of prosecution of the instant case as to the violation of the Road Traffic Act among the facts charged.

arrow