The Defendants’ appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

The Defendants merely received hospitalized treatment according to the direction of the doctor when there is a need for hospitalization, and do not make false or exaggerated hospitalization.

Judgment

The lower court, on the following grounds, found the Defendants guilty of the charges of this case on the following grounds: (a) the Defendants subscribed to multiple insurance policies whose coverage overlaps; and (b) the Defendants were repeatedly hospitalized to receive sufficient medical treatment on the sole basis of hospital treatment, without notifying such circumstances; (c) determined that the Defendants claimed insurance money corresponding to the period of hospitalization and received unfair or excessive insurance money;

Defendant

A around December 15, 2006, around December 21, 2006, entered into an insurance contract with the victim interesting country life insurance company and each insurance contract with the victim interesting country life insurance company from December 15, 2006 to December 29, 2006. Defendant B entered into four insurance companies from August 16, 2007 to March 14, 2008, including entering into an insurance contract with the victim interesting country life insurance company and the insurance contract with the victim interesting country life insurance company for a short period of time from December 15, 2006 to December 29, 2006.

Defendant

After entering into an insurance contract as above, A hospitalized at least 900 days from January 18, 2007 to October 26, 201. After entering into an insurance contract with the victim interesting country life insurance company, Defendant B entered into the insurance contract with the victim interesting country life insurance company, and repeated the contract from May 23, 2008 to November 24, 201, including hospitaling at least 550 days for approximately 90 days.

However, during the period of hospitalization in the decision of the court below, the defendants' major name is the diagnosis of the patient's subjective appeal.