Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

The defendants are 4,356,735 won in fraud to each applicant for compensation.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was aware of Defendant H, who was working in F C C C C C in the Lao non-Nitan City and was operating the company G at the same time, and was in short of capital, Defendant A accessed the victim E who was known to it and offered a proposal for the operation of the company.

On July 15, 2005, the Defendants, at the “Jada” located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I, concluded that “We already operated G transportation companies, and had 30 or more off the offline in Laos.” The Defendants made a false statement to the effect that, after being awarded a successful bid for a middle and high-speed bus, there are a lot of profits if they are sold at a low speed. The Defendants are divided into KRW A40% and KRW 40% by the victim, and KRW 40% by the victim, if they fully bear the costs of selling the bus from Laos. As they had already received 30 or more off the offline, there is no problem of selling.”

However, there was no 30 vehicles from Lao to 30 vehicles. Defendant A invested 30 million won in the above company around July 15, 2003, but Defendant K used the above investment money in full as an individual debt repayment on December 23, 2003. Defendant K used the above investment money as an individual debt repayment under the status equal to 70 million won as additional debt of the above company, and even if the victim made an investment, there was no intention or ability to manage the company normally and deliver the profit.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim to immediately receive KRW 13,900,000 from the victim, and received KRW 49,053,624 on eight occasions until September 1, 2005, such as the list of crimes, such as the list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. The Defendants’ partial statements and E’s statements among the interrogation protocol of each prosecutor’s office against the Defendants

1. The Defendants’ partial statements and entry of E and L in each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. The protocol of statement to E by the police;