1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship between the parties 1) Defendant D and E are the F Ground Buildings in the Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Incheon (hereinafter “instant building”).

2) The Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) is the Defendant Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”).

(2) The Plaintiff is the father of the deceased H (Death on March 24, 2017, hereinafter “the deceased”) who died from a fire that occurred in the instant building, and the Plaintiff B is the deceased’s fault.

B. On March 24, 2017, Nonparty I entered into a lodging contract with Defendant D and E on March 24, 2017, and lodging in the instant building J.

C. On March 24, 2017, the fire occurrence and the deceased’s death (the death of April 28, 2018) set fire to the L of the instant building, which was administered on a day-to-day basis, and was covered by a one-time throwter on the ground of incombustibility due to a fire in the network K’s fire prevention, and the deceased died of a toxic gas (e.g., carbon oxide, dysium, dysium, and dysium, etc.) from the entire building of the instant case.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1-4, 6, 7 (including tentative number), Eul evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of the claim against Defendant D and E

A. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion 1 did not operate the fire alarm and singler, and there were defects in the installation and preservation of the simplified alarm sign and the portable emergency control sign, etc. without properly attaching them. As a result, the accident of death occurred while the deceased did not evacuate properly, the said Defendants, the owner of the instant building, are jointly liable to compensate the Plaintiffs for the damages suffered by the deceased and the Plaintiffs.