A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 01:00 on March 23, 2017, the Defendant driven a vehicle B-A5 vehicle with approximately 15km in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 0.146% while under the influence of alcohol by around 01:40 on the road near this waters, in the direction of the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, around the same day, from the same day to the road near the city of Pyeongtaek-dong-dong in Ansan-dong.

2. On March 23, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (in the case of Jeju Island), while under the influence of alcohol on March 23, 2017, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle of the said infant with a speed of 5 lanes in front of the shooting distance on the day in the city of Pyeongtaek-dong in the city of Pyeongtaek-dong, while driving the said a motor vehicle of the said infant at a speed of one-lane from the distance of Korean Ambassador to the distance of agriculture and fisheries.

Since there is a section of an intersection where signal, etc. is installed, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately operating the steering and steering the steering system and operating the steering system in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was driven by the victim C (51) who was proceeding in accordance with the new code due to the negligence of failing to turn to the left in the straight line in violation of the signal, and was driven by the victim C (51) who was driven by the victim, the front part of the left part of the Dworka Don-si.

Defendant 1 caused injury to victims E (44) who were on board the cab to undergo approximately 2 weeks’ medical treatment due to such occupational negligence, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the damaged person, even though the victim E (44) who was on board the cab was in need of approximately 3 weeks’ medical treatment, and escape without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the damaged person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and C;

1. E statements;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on accident vehicles and on-site photographs;

1. The Road Traffic Act applicable to criminal facts;