1. The Defendant’s KRW 8,00,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from July 18, 2015 to June 15, 2017.

1. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as to the statement No. 11-1 through No. 3 of the claim for damages, the defendant is found to have inflicted injury on the plaintiff on November 14, 2014, as a tort, since the defendant is liable to compensate for the damages suffered by the plaintiff as a tort.

2. Scope of liability for damages

A. The Plaintiff asserts that the Plaintiff suffered damages equivalent to KRW 16,850,906, total medical expenses and medicine expenses from November 14, 2014 to July 26, 2015 due to the Defendant’s instant assault, and therefore, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the bones of bones, etc. caused by the Defendant’s assault, as seen earlier. However, in light of the result of the court’s physical appraisal of the C Hospital funeral, the amount of damages equivalent to the above medical expenses and medicine expenses claimed by the Plaintiff is deemed to have been caused by the Plaintiff’s spath, and most of them were deemed to have been caused by the Plaintiff’s spath, and there is insufficient materials to specify the damages equivalent to the medical expenses incurred by the Plaintiff due to the instant assault, and there is no other specific materials to calculate consolation money. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s allegation in this part of this case is not to be considered.

B. The following circumstances, which are acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 11 and Eul evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 11, and 2, namely, the defendant, without recognizing his mistake even after the assault of this case, filed a complaint against the plaintiff by the plaintiff. ② However, the plaintiff was subject to a non-prosecution disposition by the court of first instance, the appellate court, and the court of final appeal, and the defendant was convicted of the facts of the assault of this case (the defendant still denied the facts of the assault of this case), ③ The defendant's response method and attitude after the assault of this case.