beta
Text
1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part of the claim seeking confirmation of the Plaintiffs’ ownership of the land indicated in attached Table 1.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On October 1, 1913, the Land Survey Division prepared in the Japanese colonial era of land condition, stating that K residing in the GJ of the G of the G of the G of the G of the G of the G of the G of the G of the G of the J of the G of the G of the G of the G of the G of the G of the J of the G of the G of the Yang
B. The land prior to the subdivision was divided into 33 lots as of the present time after the subdivision. Among them, the land in which MM was divided into 1,694 square meters as indicated in the attached Table No. 1 (the current area on the register is 1,694 square meters, and the area on the land cadastre is 618 square meters; hereinafter “instant land”) and 2. The N field No. 76 square meters is the land listed in the attached Table No. 2 (hereinafter “instant land No. 2”).
C. (1) With respect to the land of this case in the registry, the date of receipt is obscure in the name of theO, and the registration of transfer due to restoration due to sale on April 13, 1947 has been completed on the land of this case. As to the land of this case in the name of the defendant, registration of preservation of ownership has been completed on September 27, 1995 as the receipt No. 52830 on September 27, 1995.
(2) Unlike the above entry of O in the register as to the land of this case No. 1, as to the land of this case, the land cadastre of this case Nos. 1 and 2 is indicated as the Defendant registered as its owner on the ground of the cadastral restoration on May 10, 1965.
After the death of K, who is a title holder of inheritance-related circumstances, his property was finally inherited to the Plaintiffs, etc., who are grandchildren or grandchildren through A P, Q, etc.
[Reasons for Recognition] A without dispute, Gap 1-15 (including each number), the purport of the entire argument
2. Request for confirmation of ownership of the land No. 1 of this case: Rejection;
A. The registration of the Plaintiff’s claim is null and void in light of the following: (a) the area of land No. 1 in the register is different from the area of land cadastre and the area of land cadastre on the register; and (b) the area of the other land
Therefore, the land No. 1 of this case is real.