A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 7, 2018, at around 00:20, the Defendant discovered the victim C (tentative name) who was returning to Korea after being drunk on the road 326 front of the 19-ro 51-gil Kimpo-ro, Kimpo-ro, Kimpo-ro, 69, the 195-ro, Kimpo-ro, Kimpo-ro, 326.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement by the public prosecutor with regard to C;

1. Each CCTV analysis list;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to CCTV photographs for each elevator;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act appears to be against the Defendant’s recognition of his responsibility for the instant crime, the primary offender, the Defendant’s primary offender, the Defendant’s criticism against the female who was going through night while drinking, the shock and fear of the Defendant’s commission of the instant crime, the Defendant’s age and environment, the background leading up to the instant crime, the method and degree of exercising force, the circumstances following the instant crime, etc., and the sentencing guidelines for the instant crime, including the following: (a) the Defendant’s age, the background leading up to the instant crime; (b) the method and degree of exercising force; and (c) the sentencing guidelines for the instant crime of assault (basic domain).