logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.05.12 2016고단7123
업무상횡령
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was a woman living together at the time of April 15, 2013

A person who actually operated the victim company's fund disbursement and management in the process of operating the victim company as the chairperson by establishing the victim company F for the purpose of housing construction project with the office office E and 601, together with D, is a person who has been in charge of the victim company's fund disbursement and management affairs from March 5, 2014, and the victim company's accounting from March 5, 2014.

1. Defendant A’s sole criminal act was committed at the office of the said victim company around August 7, 2013, where he was aware of his reputation.

After receiving a loan from G to the Korean bank account (H) Tong, password, etc. established in the name of G, the fact was that G transferred 8,500,000 won from the victim company’s account, which was in the custody of business as if G had not been employed by the victim company, to the above account in the name of G, and then voluntarily used it for personal purposes, such as withdrawing the money and paying the Defendant’s living expenses to female I living together, etc., from around that time to January 22, 2014, the victim company embezzled KRW 18,475,750 in total from the victim company on five occasions, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table 1.

2. On April 7, 2014, the Defendants conspired to embezzled the funds of the victim company in the manner described in the preceding paragraph at the office of the victim company, and accordingly, Defendant A, who was in charge of accounting affairs, did not have worked in the victim company, ordered Defendant B to withdraw the money from the account of the victim company that was in charge of accounting affairs and deliver it to himself, or to pay it to Defendant B for the cost of living. Defendant B accordingly, even though he did not have worked in the victim company, who was in charge of accounting affairs as described in the preceding paragraph.

arrow