logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.05.18 2015고단1776
폭행
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On September 12, 2015, around 15:00 on September 12, 2015, the Defendant asked the victim E ( South, 38 years old) who has performed the same work at the D Manpower Office within the warehouse of the C Logistics Center in Jeju City, and asked the victim E ( South, 38 years old) about the appearance of the instant case, and asked the victim that he was well aware.

Then, whether the Defendant expressed a desire to F and also expressed a desire to do so to the victim of the Party A, “I wish to do so.”

“In accordance with the body of the person to be asked, “A person who did not take a bath and has no person aged older than a width,” and the person to be locked again, the Defendant followed the victim’s body “a person who does not do so”, she did not have the victim’s body “a person who does not do so,” she did assault the victim’s body once by hand.

2. The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the written agreement prepared by the victim, it can be acknowledged that the victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case is instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow