1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 6,707,933, respectively, to the Plaintiff (Appointeds), the Appointeds C, D, and E; and (b) KRW 15,261,90, respectively.

1. Indication of claim;

A. At around 20:20 on Nov. 21, 1996, the Defendant driven a car owned by the Defendant GELT and proceeded with the part of the second line road in front of H in J J in Jin-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri

(hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”). (b)

As the deceased’s heir, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties filed a lawsuit against the Defendant for damages 97da6526(i) at the Changwon District Court Jinwon District Court’s Jinju Branch, and received a favorable judgment. The period of extinctive prescription expired, and again filed a lawsuit against the Defendant for damages 2007da18443(i) at the same court.

C. However, since the extinctive prescription for ten (10) years after the above judgment became final and conclusive, it is necessary for the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties to seek payment of the claim established by the claim for damages against the Defendant for the interruption of the extinctive prescription.

2. Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts;