A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 9, 2015, the Defendant interfered with his/her business: (a) took a heavy cell phone at a mobile phone sales store operated by the victim D in Ansan-si, a member D on October 16:10, 2015; and (b) took an installation of a Chinese fishing fluor; and (c) on the part of E, an employee of Chinese nationality, “dle Chinese Chinese fishing fluor.”

“after this inquiry,” means, after this inquiry, the “Jonopon, China,” means, if there is a Chinese figure.

After hearing the phrase “,” the victim’s mobile phone sales business was obstructed by force by avoiding the disturbance of about 20 minutes, such as “I ambien, I amben, I amben, I amben, I amben, I amben, I amben. I amben, I amben, I amben.”

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties on October 16, 2015, at the above mobile phone sales store around 16:30, and received 112 reports from the above mobile phone sales store, and called up, H to the slope G and patrolmen affiliated with the police box of the Nansan-gu Police Station of the Nansan-gu Police Station;

좆같은 새끼들, 이러니까 짭새라는 소리 듣는 거다

When she took a bath as “,” and she heard the speech that she would be her petition from Hab, she she she saw she she she she she she she she she with the face of the above Hab, she she she she pushed her with the above Hab, and she she she she she she was frighted with the Defendant’s mobile phone taken by using a mobile phone in the next place, and she she she she she she frightched with the above G’s bridge, and she she she she she she was frighted with a son she she she was frighted with the above G’s bridge.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the handling of reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to G, H, and E;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of D and I

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of interference with business) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties);

1. Commercial concurrence;