1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

On April 30, 2010, the Plaintiff asserted that the instant motor vehicle title trust was entrusted to the Defendant, and that the said title trust agreement was terminated by serving a duplicate of the instant complaint. As such, the Plaintiff sought implementation of the transfer of ownership registration procedure based on the termination of the title trust with respect to the instant motor vehicle.

With respect to whether the Plaintiff registered the title of the instant vehicle to the Defendant, each entry in the Evidence Nos. 1 and 3, which seems consistent with the foregoing, is difficult to believe, and it is insufficient to recognize it solely with the entries in the Evidence Nos. 2, 4, and 7 (including a serial number), and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.