Defendant

A and Defendant H are punished by a fine of KRW 700,00, Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant F, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are the members of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council, which support M pastors who have disputes over the status of the members of the Gangseo-gu, Seoul.

On October 7, 2018, at least 13:00, the Defendants: (a) enter the instant tugboat; (b) prevent the members following N pastor from entering the tugboat; (c) prevent them from having their entrance; and (d) keep the members who visit the tugboat with their hand to the tugboat, and enter the tugboat, respectively; (b) b, Defendant C, Defendant C, Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant G, Defendant G, Defendant I, and Defendant J, respectively in good hands; and (c) bdrickly blicked Defendant F with one hand while blick, and Defendant H w wn with a small or large part of the instant church and enter the tugboat.

As a result, the Defendants jointly interfered with the worship of the members who support the N pastors N.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement of the police officer concerning theO;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (cogic image analysis and confirmation of related cases);

1. Relevant Articles 158 and 30 of the Criminal Act and the Defendants’ choice of punishment regarding criminal facts: Articles 158 and 30 of the Criminal Act; Selection of fines

1. Defendants subject to suspended execution: In light of the means, method, mode of conduct, etc. of interference with worship under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act, the outcome and degree of interference with worship shall not be negligible;

However, the defendants are led to confessions in the court and are against the law. Since then after this case, the members who follow the M pastor do not want to punish each other, it seems desirable that the church disputes have occurred in the process of church disputes and the church disputes can be resolved by themselves. Defendant A and H have no record of being punished for the same kind of crime, and Defendant B, C, D, E, F, G, I, and J have no record of criminal punishment, and the age, character, behavior, environment of the defendants, and the environment of this case.