Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the subsequent order of payment shall be revoked.
2...
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Defendant is a school juristic person established for the purpose of providing secondary education, and the Defendant plans to build a new and new construction project on C and C and 18 parcels in the 1999 Yansan-si P and 199 in order to move the C and 18 parcels established and operated by the Defendant. 2) For this purpose, the Defendant installed a new and new construction relocation situation room at around that time, and wholly delegated the work related to the new construction project to the situation room.
The F is working as the head of the situation office and has overall control over all the affairs concerning the transfer of schools, such as new construction works.
3) On November 2003, the Office of Education of Jeollabuk-do: (a) as a result of a comprehensive audit, the Defendant voluntarily installed a situation room without any provision; (b) took measures such as disuse of the situation room on the ground that the Defendant had four employees, including the head of the situation office, etc. work in excess of the prescribed number of employees under the corporate articles of incorporation; and (c) reported the situation room by November 29, 2003. Accordingly, the Defendant was considered to have abolished the situation room on November 29, 2003; (b) in fact, the Defendant operated the situation room until February 2004. (c) The Defendant concluded the contract with D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”); (d) on October 19, 199, the Defendant contracted the construction work for C and C and C in excess of the prescribed number of employees; and (d) on October 25, 2000, October 30, 2006.
2) D Limited Company E (at the time of the representative director G, hereinafter “E”)
(C) On January 5, 2004, the Defendant entered into a construction contract with H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “H”) under which the construction cost of construction and landscaping of sports grounds was set at KRW 371,00,000, and the commencement date of construction work on January 10, 2004. The Defendant entered into a construction contract under which the construction cost was set at KRW 371,00,000,000, and the construction cost of construction work of sports grounds was set at KRW 371,00,000.
In this case, ‘the above construction' is the case.