A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 2, 2019, at the entrance of “C” operated by the Defendant located in Goyang-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si-si-si (hereinafter “C”) around 08:25, the Defendant: (a) reported 112 to the effect that “the Defendant would pose a threat to personal injury; (b) the police officer f or G was dispatched to the E-gu-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties on 112 reporting processing affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement related to F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The fact that the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act is not agreed with the police officers who have suffered damage to the reason for sentencing: Provided, That the sentence shall be determined as ordered by considering all of the sentencing conditions stipulated by Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the fact that the degree of physical damage is not limited to the degree of physical damage of the police officers who suffered damage, the fact that the police