logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2021.01.15 2017나64216
손해배상(자)
Text

The judgment of the first instance, including the claims expanded and reduced in this Court, shall be amended as follows:

(a)..

Reasons

(1) On March 28, 2015, Defendant B driven D D D D dump truck (hereinafter “dump truck”) around 08:15, and proceeded into two lanes between the three-lane Cheongan-gun, Cheongan-gun, Cheongan-gun, Cheongan-do, and the three-lane Cheongan-do, in the Cheongan-do, from the Cheongan-do, in the Cheongan-do, the Cheongan-do, and the Plaintiff driven the E Pob truck (hereinafter “dump truck”) to drive the E Pob truck, and proceeded into one-lane between the two-lanes.

Defendant B attempted to cross-section a two-lane from the entrance of the Cheongdon Agricultural and Industrial Complex No. 2, and as a result, the Plaintiff, as the front part of the damaged vehicle, was shocked into the lower left part of the vehicle (hereinafter “the instant accident”). The place where the instant accident occurred is a place where a non-protection and left-hand turn can turn to the left-hand turn at the intersection where a green signal is occupied.

(2) The Plaintiff suffered injuries, such as cage cages at the right bages and cages at the instant accident.

(3) Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C Co., Ltd”) is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to a sea-going vehicle.

[Grounds for recognition] In light of the facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 7 through 9, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the facts of recognition as the basis for the purport of the entire pleadings as a whole, the defendant Eul caused the accident of this case by negligence where the U.S. was engaged in the U.S. on the second line. Thus, the defendant corporation, the insurer of the defendant Eul and the Sea Vehicle, is jointly obligated to compensate the plaintiff for damages caused by the accident of this case.

According to Article 19 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the driver of any motor vehicle shall maintain a necessary distance to avoid any collision with the motor vehicle running in the same direction when the motor vehicle is traveling behind the motor vehicle traveling in the same direction.

The dump truck is a dump truck.

arrow