A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

On September 16, 2014, around 11:00, the Defendant, on the ground that he made a speech to request money from the victim E (the age of 49) in Ycheon-si D, the Defendant used iron bars ( approximately 60 cm in length, approximately 1 cm in thickness), which are dangerous things in the place, as a hand, in which he was in danger of being in that place, and read “this gue is the gue. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad.” The Defendant skeed the victim’s flaf with the

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. The reason for the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as "the most favorable circumstances for the reason for sentencing") has threatened the victim by carrying dangerous articles. Such an act is the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant that the risk is considerable, and the defendant is led to the confession of the crime of this case and is against the defendant, and the fact that the defendant has no criminal record during the last ten years is favorable to the

In addition to the above circumstances, all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case shall be determined as per the disposition.

The acquittal portion

1. On August 21, 2014, the Defendant entered into a sales contract with G on three lots, H-720 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) in the office of a certified judicial scrivener located in Seocheon-si, Seoul, with G on the title, and entered into a standard contract with G on the instant land, and constructed housing on the instant land, but did not receive any construction cost, and thereby, caused E to be subject to the provisional registration for the right to claim ownership transfer (hereinafter “provisional registration of this case”) under the name of B around March 12, 2014, the Defendant concluded a provisional registration of this case and paid KRW 40 million at the Jeju-si bank on September 5, 2014, and a certified judicial scrivener immediately around September 5, 2014.