Text
1. The Intervenor’s appeal is dismissed.
1. The costs of appeal are borne by the Intervenor joining the Defendant.
purport.
Reasons
Facts of recognition
The plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract with B character vehicle (hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff vehicle").
At the time of the accident, the defendant is a person driving a vehicle C (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant vehicle"), and the defendant's intervenor is an insurer who has concluded an automobile insurance contract with the defendant vehicle.
Plaintiff
On October 28, 2015, the vehicle was driven along the three-lanes of the E Stop area near the E Stop area in Pakistan, on October 28, 2015, while the vehicle was driven along the three-lanes of the E Stop area near the E Stop area, and there was an accident that conflicts with the Hague part on the left side of the Defendant vehicle, which was driven behind the vehicle following the Plaintiff who was protruding down.
On November 18, 2015, the Plaintiff paid KRW 5,900,000 to the Defendant as the repair cost of the Defendant’s vehicle in relation to the foregoing accident.
[Ground of recognition] A through 5, Eul 1, Eul 1, 3, 5, and 6, the occurrence and scope of liability to compensate for damages for the entire purport of the arguments, images, and arguments, and the plaintiff's vehicle's failure to keep out of the road driven by the plaintiff's vehicle, and the fact that the accident of this case occurred is as seen earlier.
However, in full view of the details and reasons behind the instant accident, which can be seen by the evidence revealed through the foregoing visual evidence, including the video in Eul 5, the Defendant is also liable for the damage incurred by the Defendant’s vehicle due to the instant accident by more than 30% recognized by the first instance court.
When a motor vehicle is traveling behind any other motor vehicle traveling in the same direction, a driver of any motor vehicle shall maintain a distance necessary to avoid any collision with the motor vehicle traveling ahead of it when the latter stops suddenly.
(Article 19(1) of the Road Traffic Act. The defendant vehicle had not maintained such safety distance immediately before the accident and had followed the plaintiff vehicle in close vicinity.
The point of accident is close to the straight line as a four-lane road.