The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (the fine of KRW 15,000,000) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant include: (a) the defendant was aware of the crime of this case and committed a mistake, and the defendant was punished for the same crime or has no record of being sentenced to a fine or heavier punishment.

However, the court below was determined by fully considering the circumstances favorable to the defendant, and there seems to be no change in circumstances that would be different from the judgment of the court below, and the act of arranging sexual traffic seems to be unfair by taking into account the following factors: (a) the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social harm, such as the commercialization of women's sex and the harm to the sound sexual culture and good morals; (b) the act of arranging sexual traffic is in need of a simple and severe punishment to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments; (c) the act of arranging sexual traffic that committed the crime of this case together with the defendant must take into account suspension of execution, forfeiture, and collection; and (d) other various sentencing conditions that were shown in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age and happiness environment; and (e) the circumstances before and after the crime.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.