A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 4, 2016, the Defendant stated that “A victim E (55 years, women) shall be paid KRW 15 million including interest of KRW 2 million, if he/she loans KRW 13 million as he/she is urgently required to share the internal distribution business,” with the victim E (5 years, women) at the D shop located in Yasan-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.”

However, there was no intention or ability to repay even if the Defendant borrowed money from the profits with a certain amount of money that the Defendant had a debt worth KRW 50 million at the time, and there was a credit against F, but there was little possibility of recovery.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, was immediately remitted from the victim to the new cooperative account in the G name under the pretext of borrowing KRW 13 million.

2. The defendant:

5. A false statement stating that “I will complete payment of KRW 10 million by adding up KRW 1 million to interest shall be paid 70 days after an additional loan of KRW 9 million to the victim, with an additional need to do so, at a 10:00 square meters from a place where the money is not located.”

However, there was no intention or ability to repay even if the Defendant borrowed money from the profits with a certain amount of money that the Defendant had a debt worth KRW 50 million at the time, and there was a credit against F, but there was little possibility of recovery.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received from the injured party the transfer of KRW 9 million to the new cooperation account under the G name as the borrowed money immediately.

3. On the 18th day of the same month, at around 14:00, the Defendant told the victim at the same place as the paragraph (1) of the same month that “The Defendant would have to repay the amount of KRW 18 million to the victim, as he/she would have repaid the money he/she borrowed prior to the loan of KRW 18 million.”

However, the facts are that the defendant's obligation at the time is equivalent to KRW 50 million and that is F.