The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, the Defendant, by misapprehending the legal doctrine, was driving a vehicle without getting out of the vehicle due to the fact that he was aware of being parked only one of the empty vehicles where he was parked.

Therefore, at the time of the accident, it is not necessary to take measures to ensure safe and smooth traffic by providing relief to the person who actually suffered damage or by preventing and removing any traffic hazard and obstacle, but it is not necessary to leave the place of accident by intention of escape without implementing such measures.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below convicting each of the charges of this case is erroneous by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of judgment

B. The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (an amount of KRW 5 million) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

가. 도로 교통법위반( 사고 후미조치) 의 점에 대한 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하면, 피고인 차량이 피해차량을 충격할 당시 피해차량이 살짝 흔들린 사실, 이 사건 사고로 인하여 피해차량의 주 유구 아래 부분이 움푹 들어가 파손되었고, 사고 현장 도로에 피고인 차량의 범퍼 파편 및 비 산물이 떨어진 채 방치되어 있는 사실, 피해차량의 수리비로 769,668원이 견적된 사실을 인정할 수 있는 바, 위 인정사실에 의하면 피고인은 이 사건 사고로 인한 교통상의 위험과 장해를 방지 ㆍ 제거하여 원활한 교통을 확보하기 위한 조치를 취하여야 할 필요성이 있었다.

Nevertheless, the defendant's act of leaving the scene of an accident without taking any procedures and measures for confirmation shall be deemed to constitute a violation of the Road Traffic Act. Therefore, this part of the defendant's assertion is without merit.

B. Determination as to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (i.e., escape vehicles).