The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (two months of imprisonment with prison labor for a period of eight months suspension, two years of community service work, 120 hours) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. There is no change in the terms and conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and where the sentencing of the first instance does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). Based on the foregoing legal doctrine, there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared with the lower court’s judgment because new materials on sentencing have not been submitted in the trial, and considering the factors revealed in the arguments in the instant case, the lower court’s sentencing was too unfluent and so, exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

It does not appear.

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Article 60(3) of the Juvenile Act on the ground that the 6th column for the application of the law in the judgment of the court below is obvious that the 6th order of the court below is added by mistake, and thus, it is corrected that it is ex officio deleted under Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure).