logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2018.11.15 2018고정233
공유수면관리및매립에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.

Defendant

A shall be KRW 100,000 if a fine is not paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A Co., Ltd. is a corporation established for the purpose of building and repairing ships, and Defendant A is the representative director of the above Co., Ltd.

1. Defendant A

(a) Any person who intends to occupy and use public waters in violation of Acts on the management and reclamation of public waters shall obtain permission to occupy or use public waters from the management agency of public waters;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without obtaining permission to occupy and use public waters from the Gyeongnam-do Port Policy Division, which is an official in charge of the management of public waters, occupied and used the public waters without permission when building a ship at a size of approximately 1,893 square meters in the aggregate of the common waters owned by Do branch lines in the Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si and the common waters owned by Do branch lines in the 1,893 square meters.

B. Around August 11, 2017, the Defendant destroyed 10 sets of the market price, which is the victim’s ownership, by having the strings of 10 strings, which are installed by the victim H, in F and G around 17:20 on August 11, 2017, on the ground that the passage of 10 strings installed by the victim H in F and G around 17:20 on August 11, 201.

2) On October 9, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 15:30 on October 9, 2017, around 15:30 on the following grounds: (b) around 15:30 on the ground that the passage of approximately KRW 772 square meters of the land for which the victim H works in return for the order to reinstate farmland in the private market was obstructed by the administrative disposition of the private market; (c) thereby, (d) caused J, an engineer for reflavating soil to damage the utility of the land owned by the victim, thereby allowing him/her to take influent soil costs.

2. A, the representative director of the defendant B, committed the defendant's business violation as set forth in paragraph 1(a).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement made by the police to K, H, J, and I;

1. A letter of complaint filed against a violator of the Act on the Management and Reclamation of Public Waters;

1. Violations protocol;

1. Map of the occupation and use of public waters without permission and photo of light light 1.

arrow