1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 22, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with the owner of the building for the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Housing Construction Corporation, who was employed as one-time watch, and carried out the human test work. On November 18, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for medical care benefits by asserting that “On October 29, 2015, PT AB-si on the roof, which was on the roof, laid off the Plaintiff’s head after the Plaintiff’s head (hereinafter “the instant accident”). At that time, the Plaintiff received medical care benefits with the approval of the medical care for the parallel, tension, and scarcity.”

B. On December 23, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an additional injury and disease application with the Defendant to the effect that the escape certificate of a conical signboard (hereinafter “instant injury and disease”) was aggravated due to the instant accident, but on February 4, 2016, the Defendant issued an additional injury and disease approval disposition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the instant injury and disease do not meet the requirements for recognition of the additional injury and disease.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1, 3, 4, and Gap evidence 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff was involved in the accident of this case, which felled at 2m height of steel B/T Asib, which exceeds 1.2m in width, 1.7m in length, and 16kg in weight, and shocked the plaintiff's rear timber at 2m in order to fix pipes at the bottom of the third wall from the floor of the second floor of the new house of this new house of this case, in order to fix the pipes from the bottom of the second floor of the second floor of the second floor of this case, and the disease of this case occurred due to the accident of this case in severe shock.

Nevertheless, the instant disposition made by the Defendant on a different premise is unlawful.

B. Determination of each of the above evidence, Gap evidence Nos. 2-1, 2-2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, and the overall purport of this Court's request for the examination of medical records to Samsung Seoul Hospital.