A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of CTrack Motor Vehicles.

1. On May 17, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act driving the said vehicle at around 23:57, and driving the vehicle, which caused danger to traffic by driving the vehicle at a distance of about 20km from the driving distance of the Won-gu Medical Center in Gangwon-gu to the same time name-dong and the same time-dong-dong through the opening campaign. In order to avoid the attack of the Defendant, the police patrolr, including, but not limited to, the signal violation two times, the median line one time, and the number of times of the violation of the prohibition of career change, led to the occurrence of danger to traffic by driving the vehicle at a distance of about 20km from the same time-dong and the same time-dong-dong-dong.

2. The Defendant was driving a Track vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.153% at the place specified in paragraph 1 at the time and time.

3. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Measures Not to be Taken after Accidents) Defendant 1 driven the Track Motor Vehicle and proceeded bypassing it from one-lane off to one-lane to one-lane to one-lane to one-lane to one-lane to one-lane to one-lane the apartment road running in front of the ship which is located in the Dobong-dong of Gangwon-gu, Gangwon-do.

Since there are two-lane roads and apartment access roads, there are three-distance crossings, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to look at the front and right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of operation of the vehicle accurately

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded bypassing it from the first lane, and the part of the EM5 vehicle driven by the victim D, which was driven by the victim D at the second lane, was shocked by the front part of the vehicle driven by the Defendant, and the front part of the EM5 vehicle was shocked by the front part of the vehicle driven by Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in the above occupational negligence damages the victim’s driving vehicle to the extent that the repair cost is not sufficient, and immediately stops.